PIES Library Entry: The Industries of the PIES Economy
Redefining Economic Taxonomy in Accordance with Real Human Need.
Introduction
The PIES Economy is a vision of a solar-punk economic ecosystem — a system of organizing labor and resources in harmony with human well-being and planetary limits.
The purpose of an economy is simple: to produce a way of life worth living.
To evaluate whether an economy succeeds at this task, we must understand what constitutes a good life. Psychology, systems thinking, and lived human experience all point toward fundamental needs: survival, health, belonging, growth, stability, and coordination.
Traditional economic taxonomies categorize businesses by what they produce. The PIES Taxonomy categorizes them by why they exist, how they contribute, and how they fit into the larger ecosystem.
This framework allows workers, investors, and communities to see clearly how economic activity supports human flourishing.
Perspective shapes action.
The PIES Economy Industry Taxonomy shapes action that is thoughtful, sustainable, and deeply rooted in genuine human needs.
Table of Contents
- Introducing the Taxonomy
- Layer 1: Mission
- Layer 2: Method
- Layer 3: Impact
- Why This Matters
- Economies as Ecosystems
- Our Vision
- Hypothetical Businesses
- How this Taxonomy is Used in the PIES Economy
- Conclusion
Introducing a New Economic Taxonomy
A taxonomy is a way of categorizing something. When talking about the economy, people usually categorize by industry. Industries are usually broken down into things like agriculture, manufacturing, etc. This is a good way of describing what a business is doing, but it leaves implicit all the reasons why to do it.
Ideally, economic activity should be categorized in a way that reveals its importance and purpose. Our categorizations should also be timeless and flexible enough to adapt as civilization evolves. To that end, PIES presents a new taxonomy for economic activity, broken down into three distinct layers.
Layer 1: Domains of Fundamental Human Needs (Mission)
This layer distinguishes the purpose for conducting business. It relates economic activity to fundamental human needs, broken down into the following 8 domains:
- Planetary Life Support
- Nourishment & Physical Survival
- Health & Human Support
- Culture, Community, & Civic Flourishing
- Learning, Mastery, & Human Development
- Mobility & Access
- Stability, Security, & Justice
- Coordination of Value & Resources
Layer 2: Universal Labor Types (Method)
This layer speaks to the type of labor that primarily supports the Mission being served. This category distinguishes the skills, resources, and effort that goes into conducting business. There are 5 universal labor types:
- Core Production
- System Construction
- Direct Service
- System Stewardship
- Research & Advancement
Layer 3: System Roles (Impact)
This layer completes the loop by distinguishing the timelines and relational importance of organizations. These 5 Impact categories help illustrate the interdependencies of organizations across missions and methods:
- Foundational
- Enabling
- Direct-Outcome
- Stabilizing
- Transformational
Layer 1: Domains of Fundamental Human Needs (Mission)
When determining what to do with our time and our resources and our effort, it can be easy to get distracted by the practical details of what to do. “What to do” needs to remain anchored in “why” we need to do anything in the first place.
Human needs are complex, varied, and tiered. Yet, we can draw distinctions between them, grouping them into domains. Here, we identify 8 domains of human need that are met through economic activity.
Domains:
Mission:
Sustain the ecological and physical systems that make human life possible.
This is pre-human and system-wide.
Includes:
- Renewable and non-renewable energy generation
- Climate systems management
- Water systems
- Waste systems
- Ecosystem restoration
- Circular material systems
- Environmental monitoring
Excludes:
- Food production (Nourishment)
- Health systems
- Transportation systems
- Financial systems
Boundary Test:
If the activity primarily sustains ecological systems that make all human life possible, rather than sustaining individual humans directly, it belongs in this domain.
Distinction Rule:
If it sustains the planet → Planetary
If it sustains the human body → Nourishment
Ask:
If this activity ceased, would the biosphere’s capacity to support life degrade?
Mission:
Sustain the human body’s basic physical requirements.
Includes:
- Food production
- Water distribution
- Shelter provision
- Utilities at the household level
- Basic household necessities
Excludes:
- Medical treatment (Health)
- Childcare (Health & Human Support)
- Community spaces
- Mobility infrastructure
Boundary Test:
If the activity directly provides food, water, shelter, or essential household necessities required for basic survival, it belongs in this domain.
Distinction Rule:
If it treats illness → Health
If it provides raw sustenance → Nourishment
Ask:
Is this activity directly responsible for sustaining basic human survival?
Mission:
Maintain, restore, or support human biological and psychological well-being across all stages of life.
This includes vulnerability and dependency.
Includes:
- Medical treatment
- Mental health care
- Long-term care
- Childcare
- Eldercare
- Disability services
- Rehabilitative care
Excludes:
- Food production
- Formal education
- Community gathering
- Law enforcement
Boundary Test:
If the primary purpose is recovery or support, rather than sustenance or self-improvement, it belongs in this domain.
Distinction Rule:
If it maintains well-being → Health
If it builds capability → Learning
Ask:
Is the primary purpose to maintain or repair people’s well-being?
Mission:
Build shared identity, social cohesion, and collective participation.
This is social belonging.
Includes:
- Public and private civic institutions
- Community centers
- Journalism
- Festivals and Events
- Music, TV, Film, etc.
- Digital social and civic platforms
Excludes:
- Direct medical care
- Childcare
- Formal instruction (Learning)
- Security enforcement
Boundary Test:
If the primary output strengthens social belonging for individuals or for the community, it belongs in this domain.
Distinction Rule:
If it builds skill → Learning
If it builds belonging → Culture
Ask:
Is the primary purpose strengthening shared identity or civic coordination among autonomous individuals?
Mission:
Expand human capability, knowledge, and skill.
This enables self-actualization, but also furthers communal consciousness.
Includes:
- Schools
- Universities
- Apprenticeships
- Skills training
- Research institutions focused on learning
- Professional education
Excludes:
- Therapy (Health)
- Community organizing
- Media for entertainment (Culture)
Boundary Test:
If the primary output is expanded knowledge, skill, or capability, it belongs in this domain.
Distinction Rule:
If it heals → Health
If it educates → Learning
Ask:
Is the core function expanding human knowledge or skill?
Mission:
Enable movement of people, goods, energy, and information across space.
This is connectivity.
Includes:
- Transportation systems
- Logistics networks
- Broadband access
- Satellite connectivity
- Ports and airports
Excludes:
- Energy generation
- Financial transaction systems
Boundary Test:
If the primary function is enabling movement or access across physical or digital space, it belongs in this domain.
Distinction Rule:
If it moves energy → Planetary
If it moves people/data → Mobility
Ask:
Does this activity primarily enable movement or access across distance?
Mission:
Protect order, enforce rules, reduce risk, and ensure societal continuity.
This is peace of mind.
Includes:
- Defense
- Law enforcement operations
- Courts (operational functions)
- Cybersecurity
- Disaster response
- Risk mitigation
Excludes:
- Insurance underwriting (could be Stabilizing role under Capital)
- Political rule-making
- Financial capital allocation
Boundary Test:
If the primary function is enforcing rules, reducing risk, or preserving order through authority or protective mechanisms, it belongs in this domain.
Distinction Rule:
If it allocates capital → Coordination
If it enforces rules → Stability
Ask:
Is the primary function protecting order or enforcing predictable rules?
Mission:
Allocate resources, manage risk, and coordinate economic exchange across domains.
This is the economic nervous system.
Includes:
- Banking
- Investment firms
- Exchanges
- Insurance underwriting
- Payment networks
- Risk pooling systems
Excludes:
- Producing goods
- Delivering services
- Operating utilities
Boundary Test:
If the organization’s primary activity is allocating financial capital, physical resources, pricing risk, or coordinating exchange across domains, it belongs in this domain.
Distinction Rule:
If it produces goods → Core Production
If it allocates value → Coordination
Ask:
Is the organization primarily coordinating or allocating value, assets, or resources across systems?
Layer 2: Universal Labor Types (Method)
The five labor types classify how a business contributes to its Layer 1 mission. This categorization adds clarity to some of the gaps left by the 1st layer. This helps us understand the relative importance of different uses of resources and effort.
Many businesses include labor across the universal types, but this only further illustrates the dependence on and importance of certain activities. It also highlights the interdependence of different skills and professions.
Universal Labor Types:
Method:
Creating tangible or intangible goods intended for transfer, use, or consumption by others.
This includes transforming raw inputs — material, biological, digital, or creative — into usable outputs.
Includes:
- Agriculture
- Manufacturing
- Software development (product creation)
- Pharmaceutical production
- Media production
- Energy generation
- Food processing
- Artistic creation for distribution
Excludes:
- Installing systems (System Construction)
- Delivering goods directly to end users (Direct Service)
- Maintaining or repairing goods (System Stewardship)
- Conducting exploratory research (Research & Advancement)
Boundary Test:
If the organization’s primary output is a produced good or product, the organization is conducting Core Production labor.
Ask:
Are we primarily creating something others will use?
Method:
Designing, assembling, or deploying durable systems that enable ongoing activity.
This includes establishing physical, digital, or institutional capacity.
Includes:
- Infrastructure construction (roads, hospitals, grids)
- Platform deployment
- Large-scale system integration
- Real estate development
- Network installation
- Institutional formation (when building operational systems)
Excludes:
- Manufacturing the components themselves (Core Production)
- Operating the system day-to-day (Direct Service)
- Maintaining existing systems (System Stewardship)
- Researching new system models (Research & Advancement)
Boundary Test:
If the primary economic value lies in establishing long-term operational capacity, the organization is conducting System Construction labor.
Ask:
Are we building something that will operate after we leave?
Method:
Providing real-time, human-facing or system-facing support, delivery, or operation.
This includes the operation of systems and direct interaction with beneficiaries.
Includes:
- Healthcare delivery
- Teaching
- Transit operation
- Retail service
- Legal representation
- Counseling
- Hospitality
- Utility operation
- Software-as-a-service platforms (ongoing service model)
Excludes:
- Producing the goods used in service (Core Production)
- Building the systems enabling the service (System Construction)
- Long-term asset maintenance (System Stewardship)
- Developing new methods or technologies (Research & Advancement)
Boundary Test:
If value is generated through ongoing interaction, operation, or direct support, the organization conducts Direct Service labor.
Ask:
Are we serving people or operating systems in real time?
Method:
Preserving, protecting, repairing, ensuring compliance, and long-term safeguarding of systems.
This includes ensuring resilience, continuity, and risk mitigation.
Includes:
- Maintenance services
- Repair industries
- Environmental restoration
- Cybersecurity protection
- Compliance oversight
- Asset management
- Risk management
- Insurance administration (operational)
- Quality assurance
Excludes:
- Initial system build (System Construction)
- Real-time service delivery (Direct Service)
- Product creation (Core Production)
- Exploratory innovation (Research & Advancement)
Boundary Test:
If the organization’s primary function is keeping existing systems functional, safe, or compliant, the organization conducts System Stewardship labor.
Ask:
Are we protecting and sustaining what already exists?
Method:
Discovering, developing, and validating new knowledge, systems, or capabilities.
This includes frontier exploration and transformative improvement.
Includes:
- Scientific research
- R&D labs
- Technology innovation firms
- Advanced prototyping
- Clinical trials (early-stage)
- Space exploration research
- Foundational policy research
Excludes:
- Manufacturing finished products (Core Production)
- Building established systems (System Construction)
- Operating services (Direct Service)
- Maintaining existing systems (System Stewardship)
Boundary Test:
If the organization’s primary value lies in creating new knowledge or advancing capability beyond current standards, the organization conducts Research & Advancement labor.
Ask:
Are we expanding what is possible?
Layer 3: Impact (System Roles)
This layer identifies the structural role an organization plays in the broader economic ecosystem. It helps illuminate dependencies and symbioses between businesses.
By understanding dependencies, we can better appreciate various organizations. However, it’s also useful for understanding footprints and the true costs of specific economic activity.
To complete the loop of mission → method → impact, this layer employs 5 system roles to characterize how the organization impacts the Mission and beyond.
System Roles:
Impact:
The continuous operation of systems that are necessary for entire domains or systems to function at all.
If the organization fails, cascading breakdown occurs.
Includes:
- Electrical grid operators
- Core food supply chains
- Primary water systems
- Core internet backbone providers
- Major public health infrastructure
- Core banking clearing systems
Excludes:
- Businesses that are important but not structurally indispensable
- Innovative firms that expand capability but are not yet systemic
- Lifestyle or discretionary services
Boundary Test:
If there are numerous or layered dependencies on this organization, this organization has a Foundational impact.
Ask:
If this organization ceased operations tomorrow, would large portions of the economy be unable to function?
Impact:
The increase of the capacity, efficiency, or effectiveness of multiple other domains.
It is not foundational, but it multiplies impact.
Includes:
- Software platforms
- Payment processors
- Logistics coordination systems
- Professional consulting firms
- Tool manufacturers
- Data infrastructure providers
Excludes:
- Core utilities (Foundational)
- Businesses serving only end-users directly (Direct-Outcome)
- Maintenance-only operations (Stabilizing)
Boundary Test:
If this organization amplifies the impact of other organizations, this organization has an Enabling impact.
Ask:
Does this organization primarily empower others to perform their work more effectively?
Impact:
The direct, immediate, tangible fulfillment of a human need.
It sits at the interface between system and person.
Includes:
- Hospitals
- Grocery stores
- Schools
- Transit operators
- Restaurants
- Housing providers
- Cultural venues
Excludes:
- Firms building systems for others to operate (System Construction + Enabling)
- Maintenance firms
- Pure research labs
Boundary Test:
If this organization directly interacts with people in real time to fulfill their need, this organization has a Direct-Outcome impact.
Ask:
Does this organization directly fulfill the Layer 1 mission for individuals or communities in real time?
Impact:
The maintenance of continuity, the reduction of risk, and the prevention of systemic failure.
It preserves equilibrium.
Includes:
- Maintenance companies
- Insurance providers
- Cybersecurity firms
- Risk management institutions
- Compliance services
- Environmental remediation
- Long-term asset managers
Excludes:
- Organizations that build new systems (System Construction)
- Pure innovation firms (Transformational)
- Direct service providers
Boundary Test:
If this organization maintains the balance and momentum of systems, the organization has a Stabilizing impact.
Ask:
Is the primary function to prevent breakdown, ensure resilience, or preserve system integrity?
Impact:
The expansion of the frontier of what is possible materially, technologically, or socially.
It pushes systemic evolution.
Includes:
- Frontier energy research
- Space exploration companies
- Breakthrough biotech firms
- Radical climate innovation startups
- Next-generation infrastructure labs
Excludes:
- Incremental improvement firms
- Established system operators
- Maintenance providers
Boundary Test:
If the organization improves and advances the way that others do what they do, this organization has a Transformational impact.
Ask:
Is the organization’s central value proposition expanding capability beyond current systemic limits?
Why This Matters
Redefining terminology is a task not to be taken lightly. It must be done with purpose and intention or else it’s just semantics. Our intention is to reframe how we evaluate economic activity.
Classical Economic Taxonomy
Traditional economic classification systems categorize businesses by what they produce — agriculture, manufacturing, retail, technology. These systems are useful for accounting and regulation, but they do not tell us whether our economy is structured to meet human needs.
A sector can grow rapidly while degrading ecological systems. An industry can be profitable while eroding social cohesion. Classical taxonomies describe activity, but they do not evaluate purpose.
Human Needs in Today’s Economy
Modern economies often obscure the connection between labor and life. Workers may not know which fundamental need their effort supports. Investors may not know which human systems their capital strengthens. Consumers may not understand the broader effects of their purchases.
When the relationship between economic activity and human need is unclear, misalignment grows. The PIES Taxonomy restores that visibility. It allows us to ask:
- Are we investing enough in planetary stability?
- Are we over-investing in short-term consumption?
- Are foundational systems resilient?
Building the Economy of the Future
If we want an economy that produces a thriving way of life, we must intentionally cultivate it. By categorizing economic activity through Mission, Method, and Impact, we can:
- Align capital with long-term well-being.
- Elevate essential labor.
- Identify system fragility.
- Encourage responsible innovation.
This is not about forcing outcomes. It is about creating transparency so that informed choice can shape the future.
Economies as Ecosystems
Why Ecosystems are a Good Lens
Ecosystems are not defined by humans, they are observed. The biggest thing that we see when viewing ecosystems is interdependence.
The edges of ecosystems are not always clear, and the connections between different organisms and populations are numerous and layered. Plants depend on bugs, which depend on animals. Animals depend on bugs, which depend on plants. The web of life extends into micro-biology and macro-biology.
This structure is very analogous to human civilization and human activity. Each action by each person impacts all the other people, directly and indirectly. This is why careful organization of human activity is so important, because our activity impacts every one of us.
The Gardening Approach to Economies
One thing you absolutely cannot do with ecosystems is force them. The more that humanity tries to force nature into compliance, the more it fights back. There’s no way to completely control an ecosystem, nor can you completely control an economy.
Gardeners don’t try to control ecosystems. Advanced gardening practices, like permaculture, emphasize working with ecosystems. This shift allows for greater efficiency, effectiveness, and ease.
By viewing our economies as ecosystems, we can more easily understand how to work with our economies. This allows us to shape economic activity without harming it. By viewing ourselves as gardeners of the economy, we can identify how to make the economy produce efficiently, effectively, and easily. We can choose what crops nourish us. We can make the garden beautiful, peaceful, satisfying.
This is where we make interdependence work for us. Once we understand how each part of our way of life depends on other activities across our economy, we can pair functions, institute redundancies, and compound effectiveness.
All that’s left is the gardening. Building soil, planting seeds, watering, tending, and harvesting. In other words, we can choose which businesses to support. We can choose where we want to work. We can choose who to invest in. We can choose what services and goods we buy. Over time, we’ll find ourselves surrounded by a paradise of our own making.
Our Vision
The PIES Economy will look like a balanced ecosystem:
- Foundational systems are reliable and resilient.
- Direct human needs are fulfilled with dignity.
- Transformational innovation builds on stability, not chaos.
- Care and stewardship are visible and valued.
- Capital flows reflect long-term alignment rather than short-term extraction.
In this system:
- Workers understand their contribution.
- Investors understand their impact.
- Citizens understand their economy.
The Industries of the Future
They industries of the future will not be categorized by narrow production labels, but by the human needs they fulfill.
What needs are being tended to? Will these needs continue to be met in the future?
The industries of the future will not depend on extraction, they’ll sustain themselves through stewardship.
We will see:
- Energy systems that regenerate ecosystems rather than deplete them.
- Food systems that nourish both people and soil.
- Health systems that prioritize prevention and lifelong vitality.
- Civic institutions strengthened by transparent digital tools.
- Mobility systems that reduce friction while preserving planetary stability.
- Financial systems that reward long-term alignment over short-term volatility.
Industry will become legible through purpose.
Raising Standards of Living
Raising standards of living does not mean increasing consumption indefinitely. It means:
- Reliable access to foundational systems
- Reduced systemic fragility
- Greater alignment between work and meaning
- Increased capacity for leisure and retirement
- Lower stress from economic insecurity
A higher standard of living is achieved when foundational systems are stable, direct human needs are fulfilled, and resource flows reinforce long-term flourishing.
Sustaining a Thriving Way of Life
Sustainability is not stagnation, it is resilience with progress. In a thriving PIES Economy:
- Foundational systems are redundant and protected.
- Transformational innovation builds on stability.
- Stewardship is valued equally with innovation.
- Direct service labor is dignified.
- Capital serves the mission rather than distorting it.
This creates an economy capable of sustaining prosperity across generations.
Hypothetical Businesses
Some examples of businesses that would be welcome additions to the economic ecosystem we hope to build. These examples should help illustrate not only what kind of economy we’re building, but how it would be classified through this new taxonomy.
Example 1: Regional Solar Grid Operator
Layer 1: Planetary Life Support Systems
Layer 2: Direct Service
Layer 3: Foundational
This organization operates renewable energy systems that power hospitals, food supply chains, and communications infrastructure. If it ceases operation, cascading disruption occurs.
Example 2: Community Childcare Cooperative
Layer 1: Health & Human Support Systems
Layer 2: Direct Service
Layer 3: Direct-Outcome
This organization supports working families and childhood development, directly sustaining vulnerable individuals.
Example 3: National Fiber Broadband Deployment Firm
Layer 1: Mobility & Access
Layer 2: System Construction
Layer 3: Transformational
This organization expands access to digital opportunity across rural regions, reshaping economic participation.
Example 4: Cybersecurity Compliance Firm
Layer 1: Stability, Security & Justice
Layer 2: System Stewardship
Layer 3: Stabilizing
This organization protects digital systems from failure and exploitation, maintaining trust in infrastructure.
How this Taxonomy is Used in the PIES Economy
Governance Frameworks
The PIES Economy will use this taxonomy as a listing and governance framework. Before a company goes public on the PIES Exchange, it must formally declare a mission and codify that mission into its corporate charter. That declaration is not branding, it’s a legally binding commitment. The company must also connect its mission to one or more Need Domains (Layer 1), identify one or more Labor Types (Layer 2) that it will use, and one or more System Roles (Layer 3) that it will fulfill to clarify how it contributes to the broader ecosystem. This creates structural transparency from day one: investors know what needs the company exists to serve, how it creates value, and how the broader economy depends on it.
Evaluation and Accountability
Once listed, the taxonomy becomes a tool for ongoing evaluation and accountability. Shareholders evaluate company performance relative to its declared mission, not just quarterly earnings. A firm classified under Health & Human Support, for example, will be judged by whether it genuinely improves well-being, not merely by financial performance. Because each domain has clear boundaries and defined purpose, companies cannot drift into vague mission statements without scrutiny. Public reporting, investor voting, and reputational dynamics all operate within this shared framework, aligning capital with long-term human flourishing rather than short-term extraction.
Analysis and Allocation
Finally, the taxonomy enables ecosystem-level analysis and capital allocation. Investors can assess whether capital is over-concentrated in certain domains and underinvested in others. Investors can construct portfolios intentionally, choosing to strengthen Foundational systems, support Direct-Outcome services, or back Transformational innovation. Workers can identify which domains they wish to contribute to, and communities can understand how local businesses fit into larger systemic interdependencies. In practical terms, the taxonomy becomes the organizing language of the PIES Economy. It will shape listing standards, investor decisions, public discourse, and long-term economic design.
Conclusion
An economy is not an abstract machine. It is the sum of our collective labor, our shared resources, and the systems we build to sustain our way of life. How we categorize economic activity shapes how we understand it, and how we understand it shapes how we guide it.
The PIES Taxonomy does not attempt to control economic activity. It does not prescribe specific outcomes or dictate moral conclusions. Instead, it offers clarity. By organizing economic activity through Mission, Method, and Impact, it makes visible the relationship between human need and human effort. It allows us to see where our energy is flowing, which systems are foundational, which are fragile, and which are expanding the frontier of possibility.
When businesses legally commit to a mission, when investors evaluate performance in context, and when citizens understand how their work and consumption fit into a broader ecosystem, the economy becomes more legible. Legibility creates accountability. Accountability creates alignment. Alignment makes long-term flourishing possible.
This taxonomy is not an endpoint. It is a tool, designed to evolve alongside human civilization. As our understanding of human needs deepens and our systems grow more complex, the framework can adapt. But its foundation remains constant: an economy exists to support a way of life worth living.
This is one way, one standard, by which to measure how well our efforts are transforming into a life worth living.
We hope you’ll consider it.
Thank you for reading
